David Martin
Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.
1. Dummy up. If it’s not reported, if it’s not news, it didn’t happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the “how dare you?” gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as “rumors” or, better yet, “wild rumors.” If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through “rumors.”
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like “conspiracy theorist,” “nut,” “ranter,” “kook,” “crackpot,” and of course, “rumor monger.” You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as “old news.”
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as “confession and avoidance” or “taking the limited hang-out route.” This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal “mistakes.” This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven’t reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.
Adauga un comentariu!
Editoriale din aceeasi categorie
Autor: Aciduzzul | 10 martie, 2021 | 1 comentarii | 273 vizualizari | 4 voturi
Evident, doar oligofrenii si deficientii mintali in stadiu avansat pot crede ca poti lua Covid mai repede mancand o friptura sau band o bere la un restaurant cu cativa prieteni, decat calcandu-te in picioare in hipermarket. Si totusi, nu s-a luat niciodata in calcul inchiderea hipermarket-urilor. A pietelor taranesti, in schimb, da…Explicatia este simpla. Desi […]
Autor: Aciduzzul | 11 ianuarie, 2015 | 0 comentarii | 1249 vizualizari | 4 voturi
Faptul că dispozitivele psihotronice au ajuns atât de avansate încât pot menține într-o stare de letargie populația unei întregi țări, de exemplu, nu mai reprezintă o surpriză pentru cei avizați…Desigur, foarte mulți v-ați întrebat probabil cum de este posibil ca într-o țară ca România, jefuită și umilită de decenii, oamenii să nu fie în stare […]
Autor: Aciduzzul | 20 octombrie, 2014 | 0 comentarii | 901 vizualizari | 4 voturi
Inainte de 1989, nici un procuror nu ajungea sef daca nu era instruit special la scoala Securitatii de la Bran, dezvaluie ex-procurorul Alexandru Pantea intr-un amplu interviu pe care il publicam incepand de astazi in “Romania libera”. La scoala Securitatii de la Bran, tinerii procurori erau invatati sa fabrice probe, sa santajeze, sa aresteze, sa […]
Autor: Aciduzzul | 21 august, 2013 | 0 comentarii | 870 vizualizari | 5 voturi
Autor: Aciduzzul | 25 iunie, 2013 | 0 comentarii | 1545 vizualizari | 8 voturi
Crearea de frica ignoranta si confuzie A castiga lupta pentru atentie – A se capta cu orice pret atentia respectivilor si a-i determina sa faca ce vrei tu! A crea nevoile lor si a-i ajuta apoi sa le acopere (Este vechea sintagma a lui Nietzsche :” Daca vrei ca lumea sa-ti fie recunoscatore, nu le […]